Pete Burns Claims That Celebrity Big Brother Was A Fix!
Pete Burns has claimed that the recent series of Celebrity Big Brother was rigged so that the non-celebrity Chantelle Houghton would win.
“I am absolutely confident, whether they want to sue me or not, that it’s rigged. It was obvious Chantelle was going to win,” he said.
Pete Burns of band Dead Or Alive also criticised the editing team stating “Everybody has a role that they’re edited into, it’s an extremely creative show that’s put together by a team of eminent psychologists to hit people’s trigger points.”
Its obvious that Pete feels hard done by. At heart he is clearly a sweet little pussy cat who wouldn’t hurt a fly, but that big bad editing team made him look like a school bully and a nasty spiteful man/woman. If we the public had seen the true him of course we would have wanted Pete instead of Chantelle to win!
Pull the other one Pete!
Loading ...
March 2nd, 2006 at 2:08 pm
i think pete should have won.he was not false.what you see is what you get.i think he was the most entertaing one out of the whole lot.and the only true celebrity.look forward to getting his book.but would love to get a signed one.
March 4th, 2006 at 3:31 pm
I agree that pete should of won,who says that you need to be defined/catagorised in one gender,he is unique and should be celebrated.
The fact that chantelle won big brother demonstrates what it takes to be a celebrity,the clasification of celebrity has been vastly diluted!!! no talent required
March 24th, 2006 at 11:45 pm
pete might of been the most entertaining but he didnt have to be a bitch all the time, i think he over stepped the mark a few times and as for chantelle she might not of been a celebrity but i think she mixed in really well with everyone considering she had alot to contend with, i think she deserved to win
April 30th, 2006 at 11:46 am
Pete is a silly man, i like him at first as he was upfront but when he wore the gorilla coat i was disgusted, it was not a fix as 65% of all brittan (out of 100%) are animal rights activists. Me being one of them believe what pete did was disrispectful, cruel and down right sick. Chantelle deserved to win because she was a lovely truthful girl. Carry on chantelle and GET F****D BURNS peace out!
August 10th, 2006 at 10:31 pm
Chantelle was put in the programme to put the celebrities in their place, so it was obvious this girl had to win. As that was the purpose of that series of big brother.
The production team were aware of Petes coat and love of fur. I believe this is one reason morrisey publicly fell out with mr burns years ago.So they allowed him to wear them knowing their would be an outcry and possible police involvement.It in fact was a monkey coat not gorilla , which is still deplorable.
Pete in BB 7 and his tourettes was supposed to be the chantelle of this series, but it was so obvious.People started shouting fix, which it was.
So the BB production team decided nikki should be the new chantelle, but it was to late as she had already been evicted, so they had to bring her back which they did using rule 12. The BB contract states she had forfeited her prize by being evicted. But rule 12 means you can change anything or any rule in the contract.
So wheter Pete Burns wears a monkey coat or not he is still right about the show being “fixed”.
PS I am a vegetarian, anti fur etc so couldnt be pete’s friend like morrrisey , for moral reasons.
He was still right about the show as we all can see now.
August 10th, 2006 at 11:11 pm
On the lines of coincidence, chance, fixes etc. the chance of someone getting a golden ticket who has auditioned for BB are incredibly low.
I wonder if this all ends up in court people will be so keen to defend their actions underoath. Is Big Brother worth serving a jail term for ?
August 11th, 2006 at 1:17 pm
I dont think Pete expected to win Big Brother at all. I dont think he also complained cos he didnt win.
I dont think he deserved to win , not for wearing fur ( as j-lo loves fur ) and she is not hated for it.
Pete is a terrible bully and I objected to him bullying Tracy , even though she is not a young woman, she couldnt fight back and she was overpowered by Mr Burns.
You shouldnt allow his appearance , his fur loving ways and his bullying to cloud the fact , that Chantelle was put in the programme to win.
Whether she deserved to win or not is not the issue of contention, she was going to win regardless of what any of the public thought.
Yes she is loveable, pleasant and silly, but she was put in the show to win and that is all Pete was saying folks, nothing else.xxx
Sometimes we let our emotions cloud reality and we judge the person and not what they are saying.
Even if you truly hate a person, it doesnt mean everything they say is a lie. The same way if you truly like a person everything they say is not necessarily true.
It is apparant that the psycholgist are employed for the general public and not the contestants. I dont think Mr Burns feels he is hard done by, as it wasnt as if he was pipped to the post by Chantelle.
He is just stated what he saw the fact he said he didnt mind being sued, shows he would say the same in court under oath.
I dont think Pete Burns would perjure himself to get back at Big Brother. The fact he wasnt taken to court by Big Brother for violating his contract, which he did by saying this, may suggest he actually had nothing to hide and was speaking the truth.
If he dropped the fur wearing and the awful bullying, he wouldnt be a bad bloke. But then again he wouldnt be Pete Burns.
August 11th, 2006 at 1:25 pm
I think it is also strange that Ofcom told off celebrity Big Brother for a comment I think Preston made about having tourettes, when he swore.
The irony is that Big Brother apologised to the tourettes society and the favourite to win BB7, two weeks before the programme started is a person who actually has tourettes.
The chances of this occuring are the same as a person who got through to the final rounds of big brother auditions finding a golden ticket in a bar of chocolate.
If young Bonnie can get done by the crown prosecution service for pinching a thin and crispy pizza, surely BB cant get away with all this.
October 16th, 2006 at 7:57 am
Thank you !!!
Sad but true I’ve wated months to find out what lil’Bonnie had done wrong …and its all down to a thin and crispy pizza ….wow rock’n ‘roll
October 28th, 2008 at 9:46 pm
Message for animal-lva: So, “65% of all brittan(sic) is animal rights activists” Whaaaaaat??? Where did you pluck this nonsensical figure from? You are seriously in cloud-cuckoo land if you believe that to be true. Show me your evidence/research. Animal lovers perhaps, but activists? I. DON’T. THINK. SO.