<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>Unreality TV &#187; Phone Votes</title> <atom:link href="http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/tag/phone-votes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk</link> <description>The UK&#039;s BIGGEST Reality TV Blog!</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:06:22 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>Dancing On Ice: Votes Miscounted</title><link>http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/dancing-on-ice/dancing-on-ice-votes-miscounted/</link> <comments>http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/dancing-on-ice/dancing-on-ice-votes-miscounted/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:46:42 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Gerard McGarry</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Dancing On Ice]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Phone Votes]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/dancing-on-ice/dancing-on-ice-votes-miscounted/</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Uh-oh! The phone votes scandals refuse to die! Latest on the block is the Dancing On Ice final &#8211; Vodafone have owned up losing 11,500 votes on the Saturday night final. Now, while I&#8217;m sure the scandal makes for great headlines (The Star is running with TV ICE DANCE FINAL A CON), the reality is [...]</p><p><p>View the original post <strong><a href="http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/dancing-on-ice/dancing-on-ice-votes-miscounted/">Dancing On Ice: Votes Miscounted</a></strong> on <a href="http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk">Unreality TV</a></p></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh-oh! The <a href="http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/reality-tv/the-phone-in-scandal/">phone votes scandals</a> refuse to die!</p><p>Latest on the block is the Dancing On Ice final &#8211; Vodafone have owned up losing 11,500 votes on the Saturday night final. Now, while I&#8217;m sure the scandal makes for great headlines (The Star is running with TV ICE DANCE FINAL A CON), the reality is that the missing votes only account for less than 1% of the total, and anyone whose vote was missed gets a refund.</p><p>I think that&#8217;s fair enough, don&#8217;t you?</p><p>It would be nice if ITV released the final vote percentages so that we can see for ourselves how close the competition was and how much of an impact 1% of votes would have made.</p><p>If the missing votes were representative of the other votes, then there was probably a fairly good spread between contestants anyway. Unless there was a problem voting for a specific contestant like Claire.</p><p>Maybe we need to see more transparency in television phone votes?</p><p><p>View the original post <strong><a href="http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/dancing-on-ice/dancing-on-ice-votes-miscounted/">Dancing On Ice: Votes Miscounted</a></strong> on <a href="http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk">Unreality TV</a></p></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/dancing-on-ice/dancing-on-ice-votes-miscounted/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Phone-In Scandal</title><link>http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/reality-tv/the-phone-in-scandal/</link> <comments>http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/reality-tv/the-phone-in-scandal/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:18:25 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Gerard McGarry</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Phone Votes]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/reality-tv/the-phone-in-scandal/</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Like I said earlier, I&#8217;ve read a few posts about the phone-in scandal that &#8216;rocked&#8217; the tabloids last week. You&#8217;ve probably forgotten all about it by now and are texting your vote for something really important as you read this&#8230;. Denise calls the whole scandal a wake up call for TV bosses: How can trust [...]</p><p><p>View the original post <strong><a href="http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/reality-tv/the-phone-in-scandal/">The Phone-In Scandal</a></strong> on <a href="http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk">Unreality TV</a></p></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said earlier, I&#8217;ve read a few posts about the phone-in scandal that &#8216;rocked&#8217; the tabloids last week. You&#8217;ve probably forgotten all about it by now and are texting your vote for something <em>really important</em> as you read this&#8230;.</p><p>Denise calls the whole scandal a <a href="http://icklehoneydew.blogspot.com/2007/03/tv-scandal.html">wake up call for TV bosses</a>:</p><blockquote><p>How can trust be rebuilt when channel 5&#8242;s lunchtime interactive quiz Brainteaser sets a competition during an ad break, doesn&#8217;t get any correct answers in that time so uses one of their own production team to pretend to be the winning contestant?</p></blockquote><p>I say news moves so fast these days, the public will forget equally as fast. Since most people&#8217;s phones are like an extra appendage, voting is like second nature. Start your amnesia engines now and vote for your favourite contestant!</p><p>Jo is equally sceptical about the voting and <a href="http://sleepingeyes.blogspot.com/2007/03/take-another-little-bit-of-my-cash-now.html">cites a different example</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Let me get this straight.</p><p>I pick one of these people, some of whom are self confessed socialites all fresh from their public schools and living off daddy&#8217;s money in Sloane Square. I pay to text in. And THEY win £15,000. What exactly is in this for me? It must be the first competition that offers you absolutely nothing. It&#8217;s like going into a sweet shop, asking for 35p worth of cola bottles and getting diddly squat, not even a paper bag for your trouble. Ooh but in return, the shop owner puts your 35p towards a lottery ticket which wins him lots of cash.</p></blockquote><p>My Daddy always says a fool and their money are easily parted. He says it in a patronising voice, but that&#8217;s not important.</p><p>I don&#8217;t do phone votes. I don&#8217;t do scratchcards. I don&#8217;t do anything that involves parting with cash for something that has no discernible benefit. What are the odds of winning the lottery again? Why bother?</p><p>I think the desperation in some presenters&#8217; voices shows sometimes. We worked out a while back that a close-run phone-in with 1% between contestants is a huge gap really. Imagine 5,000,000 votes. 1% is 50,000 according to my shoddy GCSE maths! Doesn&#8217;t look so close now, does it?</p><p>Anyway, I&#8217;m rambling. What do you guys think about fixed phone votes? Did you vote much in the first place, and will this change things for you?</p><p><p>View the original post <strong><a href="http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/reality-tv/the-phone-in-scandal/">The Phone-In Scandal</a></strong> on <a href="http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk">Unreality TV</a></p></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/reality-tv/the-phone-in-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/13 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 474/494 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: static.unrealitytv.co.uk

Served from: www.unrealitytv.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 00:51:15 -->
